Reuters — November 17, 2024
Lebanese armed group Hezbollah confirmed its media relations chief Mohammad Afif was killed by an Israeli strike on a building in central Beirut on Sunday.
Israel has rarely hit senior Hezbollah personnel who do not have clear military roles, and its air strikes have mostly targeted Beirut's southern suburbs where the group has its heaviest presence.
Israel's military, which earlier declined to comment, issued a statement late on Sunday reporting it had "eliminated" Afif. The Lebanese health ministry said the strike had killed one and injured three.
People search through the rubble of a destroyed building at the site of an Israeli airstrike in central Beirut's Ras el-Nabaa neighborhood, Lebanon, Nov. 17, 2024.
A second, separate strike later on Sunday hit Mar Elias street, another central area rarely targeted by Israeli bombs, Hezbollah's Al-Manar TV reported. The Lebanese health ministry said that strike killed at least two people and wounded 22.
Hezbollah and Israel have been trading fire for more than a year, since the group began launching rockets at Israeli military targets on Oct. 8, 2023. That was a day after its Palestinian ally Hamas attacked southern Israel, killing 1,200 people and taking another 250 hostage, Israeli authorities say.
In late September, Israel expanded its military campaign in Lebanon, heavily bombing the south and east and the southern suburbs of Beirut alongside ground incursions on the border.
Israel's campaign in Lebanon has in the last year killed 3,841 people and wounded nearly 15,000 others, the Lebanese health ministry said on Sunday, a toll that did not distinguish between civilians and combatants.
Hezbollah rockets fired across the border have killed dozens of Israelis, including soldiers and civilians, Israel says.
Palestinians react in front of the bodies people killed in an Israeli strike, at the al-Aqsa Martyrs Hospital in Deir Al-Balah in the central Gaza Strip on Nov. 17, 2024.
Israel's counteroffensive in Gaza has killed more than 43,000 Palestinians, according to the territory's health ministry, which does not distinguish between combatants and civilians in its count.
In addition to targeting Hezbollah, the escalation has killed several soldiers of the Lebanese military, including two who died on Sunday when Israel attacked an army post in the southern town of Al-Mari, the Lebanese army said on X.
Two other soldiers we're wounded, it said.
The strike in Beirut targeting the Hezbollah official hit the Ras al-Nabaa neighborhood, where many people displaced from the southern suburbs by Israeli bombardment have sought refuge.
The Lebanese security sources said a building housing offices of the Ba'ath Party had been hit, and the head of the party in Lebanon, Ali Hijazi, told the Lebanese broadcaster Al-Jadeed that Afif had been in the building.
Ambulances could be heard rushing to the scene, and guns we're fired to prevent crowds approaching.
The Lebanese broadcaster showed video of a building whose upper floors had collapsed and civil defense workers at the scene.
Afif was a longtime media adviser to Hezbollah secretary-general Hassan Nasrallah, who was killed in an Israeli air attack on the southern suburbs of Beirut on Sept. 27.
He managed Hezbollah's Al-Manar television station for several years before taking over the group's media office.
Afif hosted several press conferences for journalists among rubble in Beirut's southern suburbs. In his most recent comments to reporters on Nov. 11, he said Israeli troops had been unable to hold any territory in Lebanon, and that Hezbollah had enough weapons and supplies to fight a long war.
Now that the dust has settled, following the ceasefire agreement between Hezbollah and Israel, it is crucial to ask whether this deal will last. Let's face it, we've been here before.
In 2006, Hezbollah and Israel fought viciously for more than a month for reasons not dissimilar to today's context. By conducting a cross-border raid against Israeli troops, Hezbollah sought to alleviate some pressure on Hamas, which was battling with Israel in Gaza.
The operation backfired, triggering a devastating conflict that led to the killing of roughly 1,100 Lebanese and 160 Israelis, and to massive displacement and damage to infrastructure in southern Lebanon. At home, Hezbollah was heavily criticized by most of Lebanese society for its unilateral decision, but, as always, it evaded accountability thanks to its guns.
UN Resolution 1701
That time, a combination of military fatigue, lack of an exit strategy, and US-led international pressure brought an end to Israel-Hezbollah hostilities on 14 August 2006. However, no solid plan was devised to prevent the fighting from happening again.
In principle, the current ceasefire is not dramatically different from UN Resolution 1701.
UN resolution 1701 called for all the right things: the deployment of Lebanese troops and UN peacekeepers to southern Lebanon, the withdrawal of the Israeli army and Hezbollah from that area and the disarmament of the latter. Yet hardly any of them materialized.
Israel regularly violated Lebanese sovereignty and airspace. Hezbollah quickly rearmed and built an extensive military infrastructure in southern Lebanon. The Lebanese army never deployed. And UN troops we're only given a symbolic mandate.
In principle, the current ceasefire is not dramatically different from 1701. The Israeli army is expected to withdraw from southern Lebanon as Hezbollah pulls its fighters and arms from the border area to about 20 miles north of the Litani river.
A truce of 60 days will ensue, during which the Lebanese army will deploy about 5,000 personnel to the border and join the existing UN peacekeeping force. During this transition phase, Lebanon and Israel, with international assistance, will negotiate the vital issue of land border demarcation to remove an important source of friction between them.
Déjà vu?
This sounds like déjà vu. After all, Hezbollah is not disarmed and retains sufficient combat capacity to hurt Israel and prevent its residents in the north from returning to their homes — a key objective of the Israeli government. Israel has the green light from the US to attack the group whenever it deems necessary. And it's not at all clear if the roles of the Lebanese army and the UN force will be any more effective this time around.
This also assumes that the Lebanese army receives the financial support it desperately needs from friendly international powers, including the US, France and the UK, to adequately deploy: the Lebanese government cannot provide that kind of funding due to the country's economic collapse.
Some will point to the fact that a new and more robust monitoring mechanism, in which the US and France act as referees, will make a return to arms between Israel and Hezbollah less likely.
Such diplomatic muscle undergirding the agreement can be helpful, but it's not likely to be a decisive or transformative factor.
Indeed, the enhanced diplomatic structure of 1701 isn't the real reason why things look different this time around. Instead, it is the entire strategic environment that has considerably changed, in large part in Israel's favour, due to its relentless military machine and virtually unconditional US support. Israel has never used its military might like this before, nor has Washington provided it with such unreserved support.
By agreeing to the terms of the ceasefire Hezbollah has essentially abandoned Hamas and with it the whole notion of strategic interdependence.
Hezbollah and its ally Iran will never admit it, but they have suffered a strategic setback. Their aim was to link all the regional battlefields in which Iran had influence to bleed and overwhelm Israel. But Israel has blocked that goal, rather successfully, through brute force.
Until very recently, Hezbollah's condition to stop its attacks was for Israel to end its campaign against Hamas. Yet by agreeing to the terms of the ceasefire, which clearly dissociates Lebanon from Gaza, Hezbollah has essentially abandoned Hamas and with it the whole notion of strategic interdependence, at least for now.
Not a Lasting Victory
Hezbollah didn't come to this conclusion alone. Iran saw how its ally was getting battered by Israel, and like a good corner in a boxing match threw the towel in the ring to prevent its boxer from getting crushed.
Of course, none of this means that Israel has achieved a lasting victory, or that Iran won't find a way to rehabilitate its regional network of militias.
But this time, given the magnitude of the damage, physical and psychological, that Israel has inflicted on its adversaries, it will take much longer than before. Risk-averse Iran also has to think twice about how Israel might react to even the attempt to resurrect its regional strategy.
Donald Trump, the president-elect, will sustain US support for Israel, but he will return to the Oval Office in January with a desire to end wars in the Middle East (and possibly in Ukraine).
If his goal is to expedite a peace deal while isolating Iran and its allies, there is no better way to achieve that than by the expansion of the Abraham Accords, which Trump can take credit for starting in his first term.
An expanded Abraham Accords could ultimately grant the Palestinians an independent state and normalize relations between Saudi Arabia (and with it the Arab and Muslim worlds) and the Jewish state.
That kind of peace will be far more powerful and lasting than any temporary deterrent Israel will create through military force.
A version of this article was first published in the Guardian.